Page 72 - Reimagining Higher Education : Case Studies On Designing For Inclusion, Equity, And Access In The Buka Project
P. 72

H. K. Dharam Singh et al. · Empowering educators through the authentic experience of

               creating open educational resources - Open University Malaysia (OUM), Malaysia





               Evaluation of the Focus Group

               A survey questionnaire with six items was used to evaluate focus group

               participation. On a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, participants were asked to rate
               their responses. The Likert scale, like the module evaluation, allowed participants

               to express their agreement or disagreement with each item. Two open-ended
               questions were included in the questionnaire, allowing participants to provide

               more extensive feedback and share their unique and personal perspectives. The

               participants from Focus Group 1 rated three items at 3.5 or below for 3:
                   1. The learning experience I gained through the classroom enriched my

                       learning process.
                   2. The facilitation of the discussion helped enrich my learning process.

                   3. The feedback given on the group activity promoted learning.



                       This indicates that the facilitation instructions during the focus group

               session for this module require further improvement. This may also be due to the
               fact that the participants had less exposure to LA. The focus group structure and set

               up will be reviewed again by the facilitators.


               Evaluation of OER

               The participants who created OER were given the opportunity to evaluate their own

               work. A survey questionnaire with 5 items was administered, and participants were
               asked to rate their responses on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5. This scale helped

               participants indicate their level of satisfaction or agreement with each item.

               Similarly, an open-ended question was included in the questionnaire to gather
               additional comments or suggestions from the participants regarding their OER to

               elicit additional comments or suggestions from participants about the OER they

               developed.
                       The findings revealed that participants provided the lowest rating for item 2:

               ‘The OER created meets the designed criteria described in Module 4’. This means
               the participants felt there was still room for improvement with regard to their OER

               materials, for example, by adding more elements such as animation, audio, etc., to
               enhance the OER. The OERs will be placed in a digital gallery for future participants


                                                                                                       70
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77