Page 198 - Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi Di Era Digital: Pemikiran, Permodelan, Dan Praktik Baik

Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Digital: Pemikiran, Permodelan dan Praktek Baik 185

Daftar Pustaka

Amo, Daniel., & Maria, Jose.C. 2013. Approaches for Quality in Pedagogical
and Design Fundamental in MOOCs. Teoria de la Educacion Sociedad
de la Informacion. 15,(1), 70-89.

Anderson, E and Sullivan, M. 91993. “The antecedents and consequences of
customer satisfaction for firms”, Marketing Science, 12, 125-43.

Bartolome, A and K. Steffens. 2015. Are MOOCs Promising Learning
environment?. Communica Media Education Research Journal, 44, XXII.

Belanger,V., Thornton, J. 2013. A Quantitative Approach- Duke University’s
First MOOC.

Conole, Grainne. 2014. A new classification schema for MOOCs. The
International Journal for Innovation and Quality and learning. 64-77.

Cooper Simon. 2013. MOOCs: Disrupting the University or Business as Usual.
Arena Journal, 39,(40), 2012/2013.

Creelman, Alastair., Ehlers, U.D., and Ossiannilsson, Ebba. 2014.
Perspectives on MOOCs quality- an account of the EFQUEL MOOC
quality project. The international Journal for Innovation and Quality
Learning, 78-87.

Fernandez, M, J.L Silvera and E. Meneses. 2015. Comparative Between
Quality Assessment Tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE
66181:2012. Rusc Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12, (1).

Gamage, D., & Fernando, S. 2015a. Factors leading to an effective MOOC
from participants perpective. IEEE UBI-Media Conference, Colombi, 15
August 2105.

Gamage, D., & Fernando, S. 2015b. Quality of MOOCs: a review literature on
effectiveness and quality aspects. IEEE UBI-Media Conference,
Colombi, 15 August 2105.