Page 58 - Reimagining Higher Education : Case Studies On Designing For Inclusion, Equity, And Access In The Buka Project
P. 58

P. V. Arumugam & J. S. Emmanuel · Course learning re-design, capacity building and

               learner engagement - Wawasan Open University (WOU), Malaysia





               mind the cognitive load theory proposed by Sweller (1988), who argued that
               instructional design (ID) can be used to reduce cognitive load in learners, several

               chunks of text-based content were converted into videos.

                       Approximately ten videos were created to allow students to experience both
               text and video-based learning content. Each video was kept between three to five

               minutes in length to avoid any additional learning load on the learners. All the

               videos were created using artificial intelligence-assisted technology. Di erent
               platforms were used to create the video content, for example Canva, Synthesia ,and

               InVideoAI. We also experimented with having learners access the revised structure
               and videos using desktops, laptops, and tablets.



               Multimodal Assessment Feedback Pilot

               A survey was conducted to gauge student perception of the multimodal feedback.

               The audio feedback was evaluated in absolute terms, that is, whether it was
               associated with the attributes: informative, timesaving, personal, and instructive

               on a five-point answer scale (“1” = do not agree, “5” = agree a lot) (see Table 4).



               Table 4
               Absolute Assessment of Audio Feedback


                                   Feedback                                Mean
                                   Informative                             4.18

                                   Timesaving                              4.03

                                   Personal                                4.32

                                   Instructive                             4.00



                       Based on Table 4, above, the respondents generally agreed that the audio
               feedback is informative, saves time, personal, and instructive. The evaluation also

               contained a more relative assessment, where audio feedback was compared to
               text-based feedback (“1” = text is better, “5” = audio feedback is better). The

               dimensions      used    here    were:    intelligibility,  richness    in    information,
               individualisation, and overall perceived quality of the feedback (see Table 5).




                                                                                                       56
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63