Page 66 - Proceeding The 2nd International Seminar of Science and Technology : Accelerating Sustainable Innovation Towards Society 5.0
P. 66
nd
The 2 International Seminar of Science and Technology
“Accelerating Sustainable innovation towards Society 5.0”
ISST 2022 FST UT 2022
Universitas Terbuka
5 0.3527553 102 0.83
6 0.3677679 118 1.18
7 0.3386125 115 1.29
8 0.3216874 164 2.11
Grouping with use PFCM method shows that optimal cluster formed
i.e. 2. This seen from score MPC highest that is as big as 0.5538285
with amount iteration as many as 31 and time computing 0.11
seconds.
3.1 Cluster Method Comparison
3.2.1 Number of Iterations
Comparison of the number of iterations in Table.4. shows that the
FPCM. method has fewer iterations than the FCM. method and PFCM
on all clusters. So, it can be concluded that the FPCM. method have
more iterations little compared to FCM and PFCM.
Table 4. Comparison Amount Iteration
Amount Iteration
Cluster
FCM FPCM PFCM
2 49 33 49
3 73 43 70
4 179 119 210
5 127 74 102
6 121 66 118
7 177 112 115
8 179 150 164
3.2.2 Computing Time
Table 5. Computing Time Comparison
Amount Iteration
Cluster
FCM FPCM PFCM
2 0.15 0.11 0.17
ISST 2022 – FST Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia 45
International Seminar of Science and Technology “Accelerating Sustainable
Towards Society 5.0